Matthew Charles Labyorteaux Net Worth: How It’s Estimated

The most credible single estimate puts Matthew Charles Labyorteaux's net worth at around $400,000, based on CelebrityNetWorth's publicly listed figure. Other aggregator sites show a wider range from $100,000 to $1 million, and at least one AI-driven tool pegs it at $810,000 as of early 2026. None of these numbers come from disclosed financial filings or verified primary sources, so treat them as informed estimates rather than confirmed facts.

Who is Matthew Charles Labyorteaux?

Matthew Charles Labyorteaux is an American actor and voice performer born on December 8, 1966, in Los Angeles, California. He is best known for playing Albert Ingalls on Little House on the Prairie from 1978 to 1983, a role that made him one of the more recognizable child actors of that era. He later transitioned into voice acting, most notably voicing Jaden Yuki and The Supreme King in the animated series Yu-Gi-Oh! GX from 2005 to 2008. His career also includes commercial work (including a Verizon spot in 2007), automated dialog replacement loop group work, and video game voice credits.

Beyond acting, he and his brother Patrick Labyorteaux cofounded the Youth Rescue Fund in 1992, a charity supporting runaway youth in partnership with Los Angeles Youth Supportive Services. The organization was publicly documented, including in Ronald Reagan Presidential Library records, though it is no longer active.

Don't confuse him with similarly named people

His last name appears in at least two common spellings across different databases: "Labyorteaux" (the correct spelling) and "Laborteaux" (a phonetic variant used on CelebrityNetWorth, Encyclopedia.com, and several other sites). In animation credits, he is sometimes listed simply as "Matthew Charles." His brother Patrick Labyorteaux is a separate person, also an actor, and the two are occasionally conflated in search results. If you are searching databases or public records, run searches under both spelling variants to avoid missing relevant entries. He should not be confused with Matthew Charles Sanders, the musician better known as M. If you meant the musician Matthew Charles Sanders, his net worth is discussed separately due to how different his career and public records are. Shadows of Avenged Sevenfold, who is a completely different public figure.

What 'net worth' actually means and why the numbers differ

Net worth is simply total assets minus total liabilities. Assets include cash, investments, real estate, vehicles, and personal property. Liabilities include mortgages, car loans, credit card balances, and any other financial obligations. A person with a $600,000 home, $100,000 in savings, and a $300,000 mortgage has a net worth of $400,000. The concept is straightforward; the problem is that for private individuals (including most actors who are not billionaires), none of the actual inputs are publicly disclosed.

Celebrity net worth sites fill that gap with estimation models, and those models vary significantly. CelebrityNetWorth uses a proprietary formula that, by its own description, factors out estimated taxes, manager fees, agent fees, and lifestyle expenses from underlying career earnings estimates. PeopleAi uses social signals and publicly available data points fed into an algorithm it openly admits is "by no means accurate." CelebsMoney offers a range rather than a point estimate. None of these sites have access to tax returns, brokerage accounts, or property deeds unless that information is voluntarily disclosed or appears in public court records. So if you are looking specifically at Charles Tate net worth, it is worth treating any site-to-site differences as estimates unless primary records are cited None of these sites have access to tax returns. The New York Times has specifically noted that CelebrityNetWorth's methodology is not independently verified, and Wikipedia's entry on the site flags the same concern.

So when you see different numbers across sites, the divergence is almost always a function of different assumptions plugged into different formulas, not access to different underlying financial data.

The best available net worth estimates as of May 2026

The $400,000 figure from CelebrityNetWorth is the most widely cited and most specific estimate available. It sits within the range offered by CelebsMoney and is lower than PeopleAi's more optimistic $810,000. Given the lack of primary source data, a reasonable working estimate is somewhere in the $400,000 to $600,000 range, with $400,000 being the most conservative and frequently referenced number. I would not treat any of these figures as precise.

Where the money likely comes from

Labyorteaux's wealth picture is shaped by a career that started very early, peaked in terms of public visibility during his child actor years, and then continued at a lower but sustained level through voice work, commercial production, and loop group roles. For a quick snapshot of the figures people cite, see the latest Charles Tobias net worth estimate and how it compares to other sites Labyorteaux's net worth.

Income streams worth knowing about

• Television acting residuals: Little House on the Prairie ran for 204 episodes during his tenure (1978–1983), and SAG residuals on syndicated programming, particularly for a long-running series still in repeat rotation, can generate small but ongoing passive income decades after filming.
• Voice acting fees: Yu-Gi-Oh! GX (2005–2008) plus other animation, video game, and commercial voice work represent a separate income stream. Voice actors in union productions earn session fees plus residuals depending on the contract type.
• Commercial work: Encyclopedia.com specifically cites Verizon wireless commercial work in 2007, and his career started in commercials at age seven. Commercial rates, especially for national spots, can be substantial.
• ADR loop group work: Automated dialog replacement is consistent behind-the-scenes work that union members pick up on a per-session basis. It is steady, lower-profile income rather than a wealth-building mechanism.
• Youth Rescue Fund: The charity was a nonprofit, not a personal income source, and is no longer active. It is relevant to his public profile but not to his net worth calculation.

Assets and liabilities: what's known vs. what's not

There is no publicly available data on property ownership, investment accounts, or outstanding debts for Labyorteaux. His IMDb bio confirms he married Leslie Labyorteaux on July 17, 2020, but no property records tied to his name have surfaced in publicly available research. Without court filings, divorce proceedings, or voluntary disclosure, the asset and liability side of his balance sheet remains opaque. Estimates are built almost entirely from career earnings proxies, not from documented asset values.

Career timeline and how his net worth has probably shifted

Labyorteaux's earning trajectory follows a pattern common to child actors who started in the late 1970s: a front-loaded period of relatively high income during peak visibility, followed by a long transition to more modest but continuous work in supporting and voice roles.

1. Pre-1978 (age 3–11): Commercial work beginning around age seven. Child commercial rates in the late 1970s were modest, but consistent national spots could generate meaningful residuals for a child actor represented by a talent agency.
2. 1978–1983 (Little House on the Prairie): This is the highest-visibility period of his career. Network television actor rates for a recurring child cast member on a top-rated NBC drama would have been regulated by SAG minimums at baseline, though featured recurring roles typically negotiated above scale. Residuals from this period likely continue to generate small amounts.
3. 1984–2004 (transition period): Includes the film Deadly Friend (1986) and various TV movie and episodic roles. This is a lower-earnings phase typical of former child actors navigating the transition to adult roles.
4. 2005–2008 (Yu-Gi-Oh! GX): Voice acting work on a prominent anime dub, including leading roles as Jaden Yuki and The Supreme King, represents a career renewal in a different medium. Union voice rates for a lead character in an ongoing animated series are meaningful on a per-session basis.
5. 2009–present: Continued voice, loop group, and commercial work. No single high-profile credit has emerged that would suggest a major earnings spike. Net worth in this phase is likely more stable than growing.

Taken together, this career arc is consistent with a net worth in the low-to-mid hundreds of thousands rather than millions. He is not a figure whose financial profile suggests significant investment wealth or business equity on top of career earnings, based on available public signals.

How to verify his net worth yourself today

If you want to go beyond aggregator sites and do your own primary-source research, here is where to look and what each source can actually tell you.

• County property records: Search the Los Angeles County Assessor's website (assessor.lacounty.gov) for property ownership under both 'Labyorteaux' and 'Laborteaux.' If he owns real estate in LA County, a deed and assessed value will be publicly searchable. This is the single most useful public record for estimating a private individual's asset base.
• IMDb Pro: Paid IMDb Pro accounts show representation details (he is listed with Innovative Artists in Santa Monica) and recent credits. This helps you gauge current career activity and whether income is still flowing from new projects.
• SAG-AFTRA public resources: SAG minimum rates are publicly published and give you a floor for what union TV and voice actors earn per session. You can use these to reality-check career earnings estimates.
• Court records: PACER (federal) and California Courts case search (courts.ca.gov) will surface any civil litigation, bankruptcy filings, or divorce proceedings that might include financial disclosures. These are rare but the most accurate primary source when they exist.
• Charity Navigator or IRS Form 990 database: The Youth Rescue Fund is no longer active, but if you want to verify its history, the IRS exempt organizations database (apps.irs.gov/app/eos) can surface historical 990 filings if any were filed under that name.
• Google with spelling variants: Search 'Matthew Laborteaux' (the alternate spelling) alongside terms like 'property,' 'lawsuit,' or 'filing' to catch any public records that might be indexed under the phonetic spelling.

When you find a number on a net worth aggregator, the best reliability check is to ask: does this site cite a specific primary source, or is it extrapolating from career history? If the answer is the latter (and it almost always is), the number is an estimate, not a fact. That does not make it useless, but it should be held loosely.

Myths and bad data to watch out for

A few recurring problems come up specifically when researching Labyorteaux's net worth, and they are worth knowing before you dig in.

• Spelling confusion inflating or deflating estimates: Because 'Labyorteaux' and 'Laborteaux' are treated as separate entries on some aggregator sites, you may find different numbers under each spelling. They are the same person. Always cross-reference both spellings before concluding that two different figures represent two different data points.
• Conflation with his brother Patrick: Patrick Labyorteaux is also an actor (JAG, among others) with a separate career and separate financial profile. Some older fan sites and looser aggregators blend their credits or biographies. Make sure any estimate you are reading is specifically for Matthew, not Patrick.
• Treating 'Matthew Charles' as a different person: In animation credits, he appears as 'Matthew Charles.' Some automated net-worth tools may fail to match this credit name back to his full legal name, resulting in incomplete career earnings models.
• Assuming child actor wealth means significant residual millions: Little House on the Prairie residuals are real, but the per-payment amounts for a 1970s syndicated drama are small relative to modern streaming residuals. The volume of plays on a legacy series does not translate to a wealthy passive income stream in 2026.
• Trusting a high estimate because it sounds authoritative: PeopleAi's $810,000 figure comes with an explicit disclaimer that it is 'by no means accurate.' Sites that present precise-looking numbers without a confidence interval or methodology note are not more reliable just because they sound specific.
• Assuming net worth figures are regularly updated: Most aggregator pages are not updated on a rolling basis. A figure listed as '2026' may have last been substantively revised years earlier, with only the year label changed.