The honest answer to "Charles Pearson net worth" is that it depends entirely on which Charles Pearson you mean, and for the most likely modern candidate (Charles Pearson, CEO of eTrac Technologies and now President at SphereWMS), no audited or publicly verified net worth figure exists. What we can do is walk through who this person is, what we know about his income sources, and give you a transparent, methodology-backed range based on the best available public data. That is exactly what this article does.
Charles Pearson Net Worth: Estimate, Sources, and How to Verify
First: Which Charles Pearson Are You Looking For?
The name Charles Pearson belongs to several documented individuals across history and geography, so confirming the right person before estimating any wealth figure is non-negotiable. Here are the main candidates you might encounter:
- Charles Pearson (1793–1862): A British lawyer, Liberal MP for Lambeth (1847–1850), and Solicitor to the City of London. He is historically notable for promoting what became the first underground railway in London. He died in 1862, so net worth questions about him are purely historical.
- Charles Anthony Pearson: A UK-based figure connected to The Dickinson Trust Ltd, The Cowdray Estate Trust Ltd, and Cabardunn Development Company Ltd. He is associated with the Dunecht estate in Aberdeenshire, Scotland. A related charity, the Hon Charles Pearson Charity Trust, has a registered Bloomberg LEI entry. This is a private UK wealth profile with no public earnings data.
- Charles Pearson (eTrac Technologies / SphereWMS): The most search-relevant modern candidate. A US-based logistics technology executive. He served as CEO of Preparis (named to that role November 2016), then as CEO of eTrac Technologies after it was spun off from Datatrac Corporation in early 2021, and as of June 2025 joined SphereWMS as President. Based in the Atlanta metro area (Alpharetta/Milton, GA).
- Charles Pearson, Jr.: A separate individual who appears in SEC EDGAR filings and federal court records (including a 2025 settlement notice in Pearson v. Optum, Inc. et al.). The "Jr." suffix is a meaningful distinguisher — this is not the same person as the eTrac executive.
- Other historical/obituary matches: Records exist for a Charles Alton Pearson III (obituary), a Charles Pearson of Castleford (1870 bankruptcy notice), and various state government payment records (e.g., Louisiana state checkbook entries). None of these are credible net worth research subjects for a modern search.
To confirm you have the right person, check for these identifiers: US location (Georgia/Indiana), logistics and supply chain technology industry, CEO role at eTrac Technologies (founded/spun off February 2021), and the transition to President at SphereWMS in June 2025. The Georgia Secretary of State's LLC registry confirms Charles Pearson as organizer of eTrac Technologies LLC (effective December 10, 2020, principal office at 1815 Highgrove Club Drive, Milton, GA 30004). That public filing is your most reliable identity anchor.
What "Net Worth" Actually Means (and Why Estimates Always Vary)

Net worth is straightforward in theory: total assets minus total liabilities. If you own a house worth $800,000, have $200,000 in investment accounts, and carry $600,000 in mortgage debt, your net worth is $400,000. The complexity is that for private individuals, almost none of those numbers are publicly disclosed. Nobody is required to file a personal balance sheet unless they run a public company, hold public office, or go through bankruptcy.
This is why estimates vary so much across different sites. A site might use a CEO salary benchmark for the logistics tech industry, apply a rough multiplier to an estimated company valuation, and arrive at a number. Another site uses a different revenue figure for the same company and gets a wildly different result. Neither is necessarily lying; they are just working with different proxies and assumptions. The honest approach is to show those assumptions, flag the uncertainty, and give a range rather than a single number presented as fact. You will see that methodology applied later in this article.
For someone like Charles Pearce, whose name is sometimes confused with Pearson in searches, the same principle applies: wealth estimates for private executives are always ranges built from indirect evidence, not confirmed disclosures.
Best-Available Net Worth Estimate for Charles Pearson (eTrac / SphereWMS)
Based on all available public information as of March 2026, a credible net worth range for this Charles Pearson is approximately $1 million to $5 million. This is a wide range, and it is intentionally so, because the underlying data is limited. Here is what drives that range:
- eTrac Technologies revenue was estimated at $3.8 million annually (LeadIQ, June 2025) and in a $5M–$20M band by Seamless.ai. These are third-party estimates, not audited financials, so treat them as directional.
- As a founding CEO of a logistics tech spin-off, equity stake in the company would be the primary wealth driver. Typical founder/CEO equity in a private company of this size ranges from 10% to 40%.
- If eTrac's enterprise value is estimated at a conservative 1–2x revenue multiple (common for small private SaaS/logistics-tech firms), a $3.8M revenue figure implies a company valuation of roughly $3.8M–$7.6M. A 20% equity stake in that range equals $760,000–$1.52M in illiquid equity.
- Executive compensation at companies of this scale in the US logistics technology sector typically runs $150,000–$350,000 per year in base salary, with bonuses. Over the 2021–2025 period of documented leadership, that implies cumulative pre-tax earnings in the range of $600,000–$1.4M, though taxes, living expenses, and reinvestment reduce the take-home accumulation significantly.
- Prior executive roles (Preparis CEO from November 2016, earlier roles at Datatrac) add prior-period earnings history, though no equity liquidation events are publicly documented for those positions.
- No public real estate records, investment portfolios, or significant asset disclosures have been located for this individual.
The lower bound of $1 million reflects a scenario where company equity is illiquid and has not been monetized, and most accumulated salary has been offset by personal expenses and taxes. The upper bound of $5 million reflects a scenario where the eTrac equity is more valuable than conservative estimates suggest, or where prior executive roles (particularly Preparis) involved equity that was partially realized. This range should be treated as a working estimate, not a confirmed figure. No authoritative published net worth exists for this individual as of this writing.
Where the Money Likely Comes From
Salary and executive compensation

From 2016 (Preparis CEO) through 2025 (eTrac CEO), Charles Pearson has held C-suite roles continuously. At the CEO level for private technology companies in the $5M–$20M revenue range, base salaries in the US typically fall between $175,000 and $300,000 annually, plus performance bonuses. Over a roughly nine-year window of documented C-suite tenure, cumulative gross earnings from salary alone could reasonably reach $1.5M–$2.7M before taxes. This is the most predictable and stable component of his income.
Equity and business ownership
The Georgia Secretary of State filing confirms Charles Pearson as an organizer of eTrac Technologies LLC. That organizer status, combined with his CEO title from the company's founding in late 2020, strongly suggests he holds a meaningful equity stake. However, eTrac is a private company with no public valuation event (no IPO, no disclosed acquisition). Until a liquidity event occurs, this equity is illiquid and its true value is unknown. His June 2025 move to SphereWMS as President likely involved negotiated terms that could include SphereWMS equity, though no details are publicly available.
Prior roles and career earnings history

A November 2016 press release confirms Pearson was named CEO of Preparis, an emergency preparedness and resilience software company based in Atlanta. Before that, his career included roles at Datatrac Corporation, the parent company from which eTrac was eventually spun off (per a February 2021 parcelindustry.com article). These earlier roles contribute to total lifetime earnings but no equity cash-out events have been publicly documented from them.
Investments and other assets
No public information exists about personal real estate holdings, brokerage accounts, or other investment assets for this individual. The Georgia residential address associated with the LLC filing (Milton, GA) is in an affluent Atlanta suburb where home values typically range from $600,000 to over $1.5 million, but we cannot confirm whether Pearson owns or rents that property, or whether it is a primary residence. Real estate, if owned, would be a meaningful component of net worth but is unverifiable from public sources at this time.
Assets and Liabilities: What We Can and Can't Verify

| Category | What's Verifiable | What's Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Company equity (eTrac) | Organizer status confirmed via Georgia SOS LLC filing (Dec 2020) | Exact equity percentage, current company valuation, any buyout terms |
| Executive salary history | CEO roles at Preparis (2016), eTrac (2021), SphereWMS (2025) confirmed via press releases and company pages | Actual salary figures, bonus structures, deferred compensation |
| Real estate | Georgia residential address associated with LLC filing | Ownership vs. rental, purchase price, mortgage balance |
| Investments / brokerage | None located in public records | Unknown; no SEC filings, no public disclosures |
| Liabilities / debt | No bankruptcy filings, no liens located for this specific individual | Mortgage debt, business loans, personal debt all unknown |
| SphereWMS equity | President title confirmed via company management page (June 2025) | Equity terms, vesting schedule, strike price — all undisclosed |
One important note on liabilities: the federal court docket for "Pearson v. Optum, Inc. et al." (September 2025 settlement notice) involves a "Charles Pearson, Jr.", a different individual distinguished by the Jr. suffix. Do not attribute that litigation to the eTrac/SphereWMS executive. Mismatching court records to the wrong person is one of the most common errors in DIY net worth research.
How the Estimate Is Built and Kept Updated
The methodology behind the range above follows a consistent framework. It starts with identity verification (matching the individual to public records), then maps documented income sources (salary benchmarks, corporate roles, equity indicators), applies conservative valuation multiples to private company revenue estimates, and accounts for taxes and estimated living costs to arrive at a plausible accumulated wealth range. Ranges are intentionally wide for private individuals because the margin of error on unaudited inputs is high.
This estimate would be revised upward if: eTrac Technologies is acquired or achieves a disclosed valuation, Pearson's equity stake is made public, or new executive compensation disclosures emerge. It would be revised downward if the company's revenue estimates prove optimistic, or if debt or liability information surfaces. The SphereWMS transition in June 2025 is a notable milestone: it may signal a partial or full exit from eTrac, which could represent a liquidity event. If an acquisition of eTrac was involved, a material revision to the upper bound would be warranted. As of March 2026, no such transaction has been publicly announced.
For comparison, understanding how estimates are built and revised is a challenge across all executive net worth profiles. The approach here mirrors what you would find applied to other media and business figures like net worth Charles Payne, where a combination of documented salary, disclosed equity, and estimated investment returns produces a range rather than a fixed number.
How to Validate This Estimate and Find the Latest Numbers

If you want to do your own cross-check or need a more current figure, here are the most useful steps:
- Search the Georgia Secretary of State's business search (sos.ga.gov) for "eTrac Technologies LLC" to confirm current registration status and any ownership changes. This is free and takes about 60 seconds.
- Check Crunchbase and PitchBook for any disclosed funding rounds or acquisition activity involving eTrac Technologies. A funding event or acquisition would dramatically change the equity component of any net worth estimate.
- Search SEC EDGAR (sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar) for "Charles Pearson" in the full-text search. If eTrac was acquired by a public company, the transaction may appear in an 8-K or proxy filing. Be careful to distinguish "Charles Pearson" from "Charles Pearson, Jr." in any results.
- Review the SphereWMS website management team page for any updates to Pearson's role or bio, which can signal changes in his current employer and equity situation.
- For revenue intelligence, cross-reference LeadIQ, Seamless.ai, and ZoomInfo estimates for eTrac Technologies. These are not audited, but triangulating across multiple third-party sources gives a more reliable directional picture than relying on any single one.
- Use LinkedIn to track any new executive role announcements, board appointments, or advisory positions, all of which are income signals.
- If you need to confirm you have the right Charles Pearson, the Georgia SOS filing address (1815 Highgrove Club Drive, Milton, GA 30004) and email domain ([email protected], per the TIA directory) are the strongest public identity anchors available.
Common Misconceptions About Charles Pearson's Wealth
"The eTrac revenue figures are his personal income"

Company revenue is not personal income. Even if eTrac Technologies generates $3.8 million per year, that money goes toward salaries for all employees, operating expenses, infrastructure, and reinvestment. The CEO draws a salary and may take distributions if the LLC is structured that way, but revenue is not a proxy for personal take-home pay or net worth.
"He must be worth millions because he runs a tech company"
The logistics technology sector produces vastly different wealth outcomes depending on whether a company is venture-backed, bootstrapped, or owner-operated. A bootstrapped logistics tech firm at the $3.8M revenue level is meaningfully different from a VC-funded SaaS unicorn. Without a funding round or acquisition, the equity upside may be real but remains illiquid and unverified.
"I found a net worth figure for Charles Pearson online"
Most auto-generated celebrity net worth pages produce figures for Charles Pearson without specifying which one, and without citing any methodology. Treat those figures with heavy skepticism. The only credible starting points are verified public records: corporate filings, press releases, industry directory entries, and court documents (with careful identity matching). A "charles-pearson.com" style personal branding page, for example, is not a credible wealth source.
"Charles Pearson, Jr. and Charles Pearson are the same person"
They are not. The "Jr." suffix in SEC filings and federal court dockets identifies a distinct individual. Attributing litigation, settlements, or corporate transactions tied to "Charles Pearson, Jr." to the eTrac executive would be incorrect and could produce a badly distorted wealth profile. Always match names precisely, including suffixes and generational markers, before incorporating any public record into a net worth estimate. This same rigor applies when you are researching Charles Pierce net worth, where similar name-collision issues arise.
"His wealth is easy to find because he is a CEO"
CEO of a private company carries none of the disclosure obligations of a public company executive. Public company CEOs must disclose compensation in proxy statements filed with the SEC. Private company CEOs have no such requirement. This is the core reason why net worth estimates for private executives are always less reliable than those for public company executives or individuals with other publicly disclosed financial interests.
FAQ
Why do net worth websites show a single number for “Charles Pearson net worth” when the article says no audited figure exists?
Most sites generate a single estimate by picking assumptions about (1) the private company revenue they think the person is tied to, (2) the CEO’s likely equity percentage, and (3) a speculative valuation multiple, then converting that equity into a cash-like net worth. Without a disclosed liquidity event, those steps are guesswork, so a “single number” is usually less trustworthy than a transparent range.
How can I tell whether the “Charles Pearson” in a source is the same person as the eTrac/SphereWMS executive?
Use a multi-identifier match, not just the name. Check the same US geography, the same industry (logistics and supply chain technology), the same employer timeline (eTrac CEO starting around late 2020, then President at SphereWMS in June 2025), and ideally the corporate filing details that tie the identity to a specific LLC. If any one of these is missing, treat the record as uncertain.
Does having a CEO title at a private LLC mean Charles Pearson’s wealth equals a share of the company’s total revenue?
No. Revenue is top-line company money used for payroll across all employees, operating costs, taxes, and reinvestment. Net worth is personal, so it depends on salary terms, any distributions, and whether personal equity has been sold, redeemed, or otherwise monetized. Without those specifics, revenue is only a weak proxy.
What would count as a real “liquidity event” that could push the estimate above the $5M upper bound?
A disclosed acquisition with known purchase price, an equity redemption or repurchase, a major refinancing where equity is cashed out, or a clear announcement of an executive exit that includes terms. If eTrac’s valuation or ownership stake becomes publicly documented, the range can be recalibrated upward or downward with less uncertainty.
If Charles Pearson holds equity in eTrac, why can’t we just value his ownership and call that net worth?
Because private company equity is typically illiquid and subject to restrictions. Valuation requires knowing the actual equity percentage, the class of shares or units, any liquidation preferences, and any outstanding debts or preferred investor rights. Without those details, the value can swing dramatically even if revenue estimates are accurate.
How reliable is the “salary benchmark” method for private tech CEOs?
It is more reliable than equity guesses for the salary component, but still imperfect. Compensation may include bonus targets, equity grants, or benefits that are not captured by generic salary ranges. The best use of benchmarks is to set a conservative floor, then widen the uncertainty when adding equity and investment return assumptions.
Could court cases or settlements involving someone named Charles Pearson be used to estimate the eTrac executive’s net worth?
Only if you can confirm it is the same individual, including suffixes like “Jr.” and matching identity details. The article highlights that “Charles Pearson, Jr.” in a separate docket appears to be a different person, so using it would likely contaminate the net worth calculation.
Does a listed LLC organizer address (like the Milton, GA address) prove Charles Pearson owns a home there?
No. LLC filings often use an administrative or principal office address, and that may be the person’s residence, an office location, or a registered-agent-related address. Ownership and property value require separate, publicly confirmed property records or other direct evidence.
What other liability or investment details should be checked, if they are available, to tighten the range?
Look for any publicly recorded debts tied to the person (for example, through specific judgments or liens that can be confidently matched), any disclosed retirement or investment vehicle ownership that is documented, and any corporate filings that reveal compensation structure (salary plus equity, distributions, or redemption activity). Most private executives have limited public disclosures, so matching quality matters more than quantity.
When you revise estimates, what are the most common reasons the range changes significantly?
The biggest drivers are usually (1) changes to assumptions about equity ownership percentage, (2) updated private company valuation estimates due to funding rounds or acquisitions, and (3) new information about compensation or an exit from the company. Even a small change in assumed equity stake can outweigh many salary benchmark assumptions for a private executive.
What is the quickest, practical way for me to verify or challenge the $1M to $5M range on my own?
Start with identity verification, then focus on only two evidence types: (1) any corporate or press disclosures that mention ownership, equity grants, distributions, or exit terms, and (2) compensation indicators that are tied to the same person. Avoid using generic “net worth calculator” inputs or celebrity-style pages that do not specify which Charles Pearson they mean or what assumptions they used.
